Free audit

SEO guide 01 / Technical

Denver SEO Audit: What a Technical Review Covers

A useful audit is not a 90-page PDF of warnings. It is a short list of problems, ranked by how much search visibility each one is costing you, with the reason and the fix next to it.

CrawlIndexSpeedMarkupOn-page

If you run a business in Denver and your site is not showing up for the searches your customers make, a Denver SEO audit is the cheapest way to find out why before spending money on content or links. This guide walks through what a technical review checks, the order we check it in, and how to tell a real finding from tool noise.

Why the Order of an Audit Matters

Search engines process a site in stages: they discover a URL, crawl it, render it, decide whether to index it, and only then rank it. A problem at an early stage hides every problem after it. There is no point tuning the meta description of a page that carries a stray noindex tag, and no point rewriting service copy on a page Google has folded into a duplicate.

So an audit runs in the same direction as Google does. Each stage either passes or produces a finding, and findings from earlier stages almost always outrank findings from later ones in the final report.

Stage One: Crawl Access

We start with what a crawler can and cannot reach. A desktop crawler such as Screaming Frog SEO Spider or Sitebulb follows every internal link from the home page and records what it finds. The checks at this stage:

  • Status codes. Every page you want found should return 200. Clusters of 404s from old URLs, and any 5xx server errors, get flagged first.
  • Redirects. Chains (A to B to C) and loops waste crawl attempts and leak signals. After a redesign or a move to HTTPS, chains are the norm, not the exception.
  • robots.txt. A single Disallow: / left over from a staging site can block everything. Blocking CSS or JavaScript folders can also stop Google from rendering pages properly.
  • Click depth and orphans. Important pages should sit within three or four clicks of the home page. Pages with no internal links at all rely entirely on the sitemap.

Stage Two: What Google Actually Indexed

A crawl tells you what exists. Google Search Console tells you what Google kept. The Page indexing report lists every URL Google knows about and the reason any of them were left out, with labels such as "Crawled, currently not indexed", "Duplicate, Google chose different canonical than user" and "Excluded by noindex tag". Comparing that list against the crawl and the XML sitemap is where the biggest surprises in an audit usually come from.

Reading common Page indexing reasons
Reason in Search ConsoleWhat it usually meansTypical fix
Excluded by noindex tagA template or plugin is adding noindex, sometimes to pages you want ranked.Remove the tag from those templates, then request indexing.
Duplicate, Google chose different canonicalGoogle thinks another URL is the main version, often a parameter or trailing-slash variant.Consolidate with redirects and consistent internal links and canonicals.
Crawled, currently not indexedGoogle fetched the page and decided it was not worth storing yet.Make the page clearly distinct and useful, then link to it from stronger pages.
Discovered, currently not indexedGoogle knows the URL but has not crawled it.Improve internal linking and server speed; check for crawl traps creating endless URLs.

The indexing and Search Console guide covers each report in more detail, including how to verify a domain property through DNS.

The audit route

Six Stops, in Order

The same sequence every time, so nothing important hides behind a cosmetic warning.

  1. 01

    Crawl map

    Status codes, redirects, robots.txt and click depth.

  2. 02

    Index check

    Search Console coverage versus the crawl and sitemap.

  3. 03

    Render

    Does the content exist without user clicks or failed scripts?

  4. 04

    Speed

    Field Core Web Vitals for phones and desktops.

  5. 05

    Markup

    Structured data that validates and matches the page.

  6. 06

    Report

    Findings ranked by impact and effort, sent by email.

Stage Three: Rendering and Speed

Google renders pages with a recent version of Chrome, so most JavaScript sites can be indexed. The trouble starts when key content only appears after an interaction, loads from an API that blocks Googlebot, or depends on a script that errors. The URL Inspection tool in Search Console shows the rendered HTML Google saw; comparing it with what a visitor sees takes a few minutes and settles the question.

Speed is measured with field data first. PageSpeed Insights shows Chrome User Experience Report data for real visits over the previous 28 days when a page or origin has enough traffic, and a Lighthouse lab test underneath. Lab scores are useful for debugging but they are not what Google uses. Our Core Web Vitals guide explains the three metrics and their thresholds.

Stage Four: Markup, On-Page and Links

With access, indexing and speed settled, the audit moves to the signals that describe each page:

If titles repeat across pagesPages compete with each other. Rewrite them around one keyword per page using a keyword map.
If structured data fails the Rich Results TestFix the errors, then check every property matches visible content. See the schema guide.
If important pages have few internal linksAdd contextual links from related pages with descriptive anchor text, not "click here".
If several pages target the same suburb and serviceMerge them before Google treats them as doorways. See spam policy risks.

The Messy Middle: Site Migrations

The audits that matter most are often requested after something went wrong: a new website launched, the domain changed, or a platform moved from WordPress to a hosted builder, and traffic fell. The cause is nearly always the same set of things. Old URLs were not redirected one-to-one to their new equivalents, the staging site's robots.txt or noindex shipped to production, or internal links still point at the old URL structure through redirects.

Recovery starts with a list of the old URLs, which can come from Search Console's Performance report, an old sitemap, or the Wayback Machine. Each one is mapped to the closest new page and redirected with a 301. Redirecting everything to the home page is tempting and almost always wrong: Google tends to treat those as soft 404s.

What a Good Audit Report Looks Like

Whoever writes your audit, ask for these things in the report, not just a crawler export:

  1. A ranked list of findings with an estimated impact and effort for each.
  2. The specific URLs affected, or a pattern that identifies them.
  3. The reason the finding matters in one or two sentences, without jargon.
  4. A fix a developer can act on, with a way to verify it worked.

That is the format we use for the free audit. If you would like one, send the site address and what concerns you.

Denver SEO Audit FAQ

01How long does a technical SEO audit take?

It depends on the size and health of the site. A small brochure site can be crawled in minutes; the time goes into reading the results, checking Search Console and writing findings someone can act on. Large sites with faceted navigation or years of redirects take longer because the crawl itself is the hard part.

02Do I need to give access to my Search Console or analytics?

Not for a first look. A public crawl, PageSpeed Insights field data and a manual review cover a lot. Read-only Search Console access makes the indexing part far more precise, because only Search Console shows which URLs Google chose to leave out and why.

03What tools are used in an audit?

Typically a desktop crawler such as Screaming Frog SEO Spider or Sitebulb, Google Search Console, PageSpeed Insights and Lighthouse, the Rich Results Test, and a browser with developer tools. The tools find symptoms; deciding which ones matter is the actual work.

Get the ranked list for your site.

Send the URL and a sentence about what changed or what worries you. Findings come back by email in priority order.

Request a free GEO + SEO audit